Friday, March 28, 2014

Seven Score And Nine Years Ago

“Well gentlemen, Doctor Lamarche assures me that his time machine is almost fully prepared, and we will should be ready to proceed as early as tomorrow morning!”

Carl beamed at the men and women arrayed around the table, his arms spread wide for effect.  Seeing only stony faces above their nametags in response, he continued, endeavoring to rally enthusiasm for the project.

“Figure a few weeks of training to adapt the subject to the twenty-first century, and he should be ready to accept the nomination for president for the Republican Party, and usher in a bold new era for the GOP!”

Once again, instead of the eager adulations he’d anticipated, the men and women around the table glanced at each other and shifted in their seats.  At the far end of the table, the Chairman fixed Carl with a steely gaze.

“There’s been some discussion about the subject,” he stated flatly.

Carl’s mind raced, desperate to head off any further delays or debates.  He’d spent weeks selling a radical scientific breakthrough to a bunch of men who’d made their careers on denying science.

“I can assure you sir, there will be no complications.  We simply snatch the subject away right before his death, and replace him with a duplicate, that way history is never the wiser.  We’ve calculated that-“

“That’s all well and good, Mr. Hinton, but our problem isn’t with the process, it’s with the particular choice of subject.”

Carl was flabbergasted.  The entire point of the project had revolved around the subject.  Decades of research, years of testing and months and months of wrangling to get the biggest political players on board, not to mention the millions spent in developing the technology: it had all been for the single purpose of bringing him to the present in order to save the Republican party.

 “I thought we had agreed that he was the man we need to revitalize the party?”  Carl looked around the room for a show of support, but received only more displays of stoicism in return.

“Mister Hinton, the individuals gathered here are some of the top minds in the country on today’s issues, and they have all been advising me on this potential candidate’s suitability.  There have been some concerns that he does not have the political and ideological profile necessary to appeal to the Republican base.”  The chairman smiled avuncularly, signally a terminal finality to the discussion.

Several long seconds passed by, broken only by Carl’s ragged breathing as he struggled to find his words.

“But it’s Abraham Fucking Lincoln!” he finally spluttered incredulously.  “The first Republican!  THE Republican!  He freed the slaves for Christ’s sake; kept the Union together during the Civil Damn War; was martyred after victory!  There has never been… Hell, will probably never be a more tailor-made candidate to assure victory!  How can you possibly have concerns?”

During this tirade, the uncomfortable shifting had increased until one would have thought Carl’s audience had all simultaneously developed severe rectal itching.  The chairman however, remained passive, and continued on as if Carl’s outburst had never occurred.

“Yes, you see there’s some concern over Mr. Lincoln’s political record; a few irregularities that do not sit well with the current party position.”

Carl gathered his composure.  Perhaps, he thought, he could still salvage this proposition.  Perhaps if he could address their issues, he could convince them the plan was still tenable. 

“What...ah, concerns do you have?”

The Chairman sighed, clearly annoyed at having to spell out what he saw as obvious. 

“Firstly, there is his lack of support for states’ rights.”

“I’m sorry, ‘states’ rights’?”

The Chairman nodded to a balding man at his left, whose ID tag identified him as an advisor on national politics, who immediately opened a file folder and began thumbing through it.  “Appalling record, the worst of any president.”

“How is that?”

“Well you have to admit, Mr. Hinton, there has never been a more sharply-defined conflict between state vs. federal rights than during Lincoln’s administration.  And he clearly came down on the wrong side of that conflict, siding as powerfully as possible with the federal government.”

“You- you’re talking about slavery, aren’t you?”

The balding man frowned.  “I don’t see how the actual issue has any bearing on the discussion, the point is Lincoln chose to support the federal government in its attempt to suppress the rights of individual states to govern themselves.”

“By which you mean slavery!  The only issue the states were up in arms about was slavery!”

“Now hold on there, Mr. Hinton,” interjected the portly man with glasses sitting closest to Carl.  “Every schoolchild knows there was more to the Civil War than slavery.”

“At least they do now,” snickered a woman wearing the ID tag of ‘education,’ eliciting a round of chuckling from the assembly.

The portly economics advisor continued, “Yes, the states’ rights issue went hand in hand with the economic factors at the time, and Mr. Lincoln did abysmally in that regard.”

“Whu-“ began Carl, his brow furrowing.

“Oh yes, his blatantly anti-business policies were devastating for several industries, most notably the agricultural interests in the South.  His administration went well beyond excessive regulation of industrial sectors; he outright broke the back of one of America’s most lucrative import/export trades.  In addition, the transportation industries took a hit due to the terrible decline in transport infrastructure during his presidency.”

“Are you talking about the sabotage of the railroads during the Civil War?”

The Chairman broke in at this.  “Let’s not split hairs, Mr. Hinton.  There are plenty of other factors involved here.  Barry, talk about his immigration record.”

A man in a dark blue suit spoke up.  “The subject openly supported a path to citizenship for foreign workers.  I don’t need to tell you how unpopular that idea is these days.”

“Oh my God, you’re talking about slaves?  They weren’t foreign workers, they were brought here against their will!”

The man in the blue suit blinked irritably.  “Well now you’re just nitpicking.”

“And what about his rotten war record?” shouted a man in the uniform of an Army colonel.

“What do you mean?  He won the Civil War, surely no one can debate that?”

The Colonel shook his head disgustedly.  “Sure he ‘won,’ but at what cost? Some 700,000 or so American dead, and zero foreign casualties.  No other president has ever seen that level of losses, and no other president has ever allowed a war to spill over onto American soil.  And what profit did the American people see from that war?  Nothing.  No new territories conquered, no new sources of resources secured, no grateful new allies, nothing but graveyards full of dead soldiers.”

“But it was a civil war, of course there were a lot of American casualties; both sides were Americans!”

“Americans defending themselves against government oppression!” chimed in the NRA representative.  "Let’s not forget that during Lincoln’s presidency, thousands of guns were confiscated from U.S. citizens, an unparalleled gun grab that will surely put patriotic Americans of today on the defensive.”

Carl could hardly believe his ears.  “How- that is totally different, they were disarming rebels after an armed revolt!”

“Put all the Liberal spin on it you want, Mr. Hinton, that’s still not something that will be forgotten by the 2nd amendment-loving people of today.”

Any rebuttal Carl might have made was curtailed by a pretty blonde in a low-cut top.  The nametag below her well-displayed décolletage identified her as an advisor on public image.  “All of these are excellent points, but it is doubtful the American people would ever even hear about them; his image rating is so poor, he probably wouldn’t make it to the first debate before the American people wrote him off.”

The Chairman gestured for her to continue as she rounded on Carl.

“We’ve done extensive focus testing, and there isn’t a makeover artist in the world that could fix him up.  There are just too many iconic pictures of him, he would never be able to shake that image.”  She began listing flaws on her exquisitely manicured nails, “His skin is terrible, the chinstrap beard is a nonstarter, his taste in hats is laughable, he’s got that glassy-eyed stare and he’s way too tall.”  As an after thought she explained “the focus groups identify height with basketball, and we don’t need another ‘basketball president’ do we?”  A murmur of assent ran around the table.

“Surely all those things are just superfic-“

“And that’s just the visual cues.  There’s all sorts of other factors.  According to reports, his voice is entirely unsuited to a television presidency, his wife is a train wreck, and with two movies about him released recently, he may come off as a little too 'Hollywood elite' for the base.  And then there’s the other issue… I’m afraid there are too many rumors on that point to ignore.”

The Chairman brought the matter to a close.  “I’m afraid, Mr. Hinton, that we simply cannot gamble the future of this party on such a questionable candidate.”

Carl’s shoulders slumped, defeated.  “So I guess I will just go tell Doctor Lamarche to scrap his machine.”

“Now hold on there, Mr. Hinton” continued the Chairman, the avuncular smile returning, “we still believe in the program, we simply want you to acquire a different subject.”  The advisors all nodded, smiling at Carl.

“Wh- who were you considering?” he asked tremulously.

“Our first choice was Reagan,” chirped the economics advisor.

“But polls showed that there are still too many voters alive who actually remember his presidency,” added the public image consultant.

The Chairman smiled “we’ve found a more suitable candidate, one whose political views are more in line with the party’s current views, and who is a better fit for today’s political climate.”

Carl looked around “So…you want us to bring back…”

“Richard Nixon.”

The advisors all beamed at Carl, who stood rigid with disbelief.  “N- Nixon?  How in the…why?”

“Well you have to remember, the world is a different place now.  People are more open to what Nixon has to say these days.”  The advisors all nodded enthusiastically.  “The American voters want a strong leader, a leader who knows how to play the politics game, someone who won’t get us in a war in the Middle East, someone who can deal with China.  These are important concepts Mr. Hinton, and Nixon has a proven track record in those areas.”

“But he was a crook!  He spied on Americans, and tried to cover it up by erasing the tapes!”

The Chairman waved his hand dismissively.  “Oh, the American people are pretty much over caring about that kind of stuff these days, he’ll fit right in.”


Friday, March 14, 2014

He Meant What He Said

“Please sit down and relax.  I’m going to hook up these electrodes, so I need you to remain still.”

“This isn’t going to shock me or anything, is it?”

 “No.  Please keep still.”

“I’ve never taken a lie detector test before.”

“It’s actually called a polygraph.  It measures stress by detecting changes in skin temperature and other factors.  By studying these factors we can detect mental stress, which might indicate a subject is lying.”

“Oh.  So what if I’m stressed about other things?  How will it know the difference?”

“That’s why we start by establishing a baseline.”

“A bass line?  Like a background track?”

“No.  Not like the musical term.  I mean a sort of basic level of stress so that we can compare it to any changes that might occur when we ask questions you might try to evade.”

“How do you establish the baseline?”

“We start by asking a few questions; basic, everyday stuff.  This gives us some readings that we can-“

“What sort of questions?”

“How about we just begin, shall we?”

“Oh, okay.”

“Very well.  What day is it today?”

“Friday.”

 “What color is your hair?”

“Red.”

“Have you ever been arrested?”

“Yes.  Three times.”

 “What is your current age?”

“48.”

“Are you married?”

“Yes.”

“Have you ever killed anyone?”

“No.”

“Were you born in America?”

“No.”

“What is your occupation?”

“Musician.  Singer, I guess.  Although I was retired for a while and-”

“Is your middle name Paul?”

“Yes.”

“Okay, we have enough readings for a baseline.”

“What does that mean?”

“That means we can begin asking you the actual questions.”

“Oh, er- okay then.”

“Let us begin, Mr. Astley.  First question:  Are you ever going to give me up?”

“No.”

“Are you ever going to let me down?”

“No.”


“Excellent.  Let’s continue…”

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Knock, Knock.

Excuse me sir or madam; I’d like to talk to you about the Holy Bible.

Don’t try to shut the door politely; my foot, you will find, is firmly wedged into the jamb, preventing such demurring.  I don’t wish to be rude; it’s simply that I feel what I have to tell you is of such vital importance that it easily outweighs any imposition upon your time.

But I will be brief.

I know you have probably heard a lot about this book; indeed it has been the subject (and cause) of many controversies, and this has given it quite the shady reputation.   There are many out there who spend great amounts of time and effort to denounce and vilify this fine text, smearing its good name and tying it to countless atrocities which are in no way the fault of the book itself.

My own sincere hope is that you will not allow such slander and calumny to dissuade you from picking up the book and delving between the covers.  No matter how you may feel about some of those who also have read it, don’t let their actions color your perceptions towards its contents.  Just because the assassin of John Lennon was a fan of Catcher in the Rye doesn’t mean one should not read the book (there are plenty of great reasons not to read J.D. Salinger’s dreary magnum mopus, but not because one of its readers killed a Beatle.)

Please do not seek to dislodge me from your doorstep and curtail my diatribe by insisting that you are already familiar with the Bible.  So many feel that because they belong to a religion that claims the bible as their default system reference document, this is analogous to serious readership.  This is as ridiculous a claim (even for the most devout followers,) as those Americans who feel they have no need to read the Constitution merely because they are citizens.

No matter who you may be, this is the book for you. 

I have heard all your protests:

·      “I don’t believe in the Bible!”
·      “I belong to a different religion!”
·      “I’m already a devout follower!”
·      “I don’t even know you, get out of my house!”

And I say unto thee:

·      “The book’s existence has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, so just read it.”
·      “You will still belong to that religion after reading it, so just read it.”
·      “Then you, more than anyone needs to understand that for which you claim to stand, so just read it.”
·      “My name is Chris, I log smart-ass observations here, nice to meet you, just read it.”

Look, here’s the thing.  I know it seems completely dated and out of step with modern life, and I know it’s been inextricably linked with more than a few religions, and thus with every less than savory activity with which they may have been involved with over the years, and obviously I know that many people equate reading it with giving tacit approval to religions and their activities.  I know all this, and I want you to read it anyways.

Because it’s an important book.

Not necessarily a great book; I mean it was written a long time ago and compiled by countless individuals collating innumerable accounts and creations, and accusing it of bias would be like accusing water of being wet; not only redundant but also redundant.  But important?  Forget about it.

This book is (at least in part,) the foundation of so much of Western civilization.  To leave the Bible out of one’s education is like omitting Shakespeare from a modern curriculum (oh wait, bad example,) or ignoring the contributions of Greek philosophers to the development of Western thought.

One can barely teach the concept of allusion without alluding to the Bible.  Our own language is entirely permeated with such references, while the book remains the prime source of baby names for people who are not so emotionally needy they would saddle their offspring with some yuppie garbage like Bleu, Aiden or Addysyn. 

And the values and ideals within are considered the underpinnings of modern culture and society.  The Bible is at least cited as the inspiration for countless writers, lawmakers and leaders who have shaped our contemporary civilization.  Something that served, in any small part, as an inspiration for so many who have in turn inspired so much of what we value ourselves simply has to be worth a look.

But the true stars of the Bible are the stories.  Action, adventure, violence, blood and gore, thrills and chills, romance, it’s all in there.  From the numerous battle scenes to the rom-com antics of Rachel and Jacob, there are some great ancient stories in there, many of them displaying a level of sophistication many do not associate with tales of such antiquity.  Even if you’ve heard the stories countless times before (usually in those awful low-budget animated videos,) every soul in Christendom (and out,) should really read them in their original text.

Now I know what worries you, revealed in your gentle shoves out the door.  You do not subscribe to the religious beliefs, and fear that the stories only work if you believe in them as the literal truth.  Perhaps you associate stories like Adam and Eve with controversy and belligerent arguments, and feel that because you accept scientific explanations of natural phenomena, that these ‘mere fables and fairy tales’ have no use for you, and have nothing to offer you.

But plenty of folks who enjoy ‘mere fables and fairy tales’ avoid the stories in the Bible entirely, and that’s a real shame, because these stories are packed with meaning and significance for the studious reader.

All one needs to do is think of them as symbolism.   Think of them as lessons told in story, asking us to read them in search of meaning and message, and applying them to our own life experiences.  In that way, they are no different from any other collection of stories.  Viewed as metaphor, these are stories that can resonate with all who read them.

But what about those raised within the religion?  Many of the faithful are leery of reading too many of the stories in the Old Testament, lest they be confronted with those tales that are not very… apt for today’s audiences.  We all know that there are stories that fly in the face of modern beliefs, especially in regards to equality and human rights. 

In recent years, the chosen manner of dealing with these inconvenient sections has been to simply avoid them, delete them from the common rotation of reading like Disney did with Song of the South (the older folks in the audience know what I mean.)  But I don’t cotton to that.  I think the entire book should be appreciated as a whole.

This of course can pose a problem, but not of one simply views these less contemporary tales as symbolism, no different from any of the thousands of other stories we enjoy today.  Indeed, I will extend that suggestion to encompass all of the stories in the Bible.  Doing so, I assert, will greatly increase your enjoyment of the Bible as a work of literature.

But how can a person trained to accept Biblical accounts (all Biblical accounts,) as incontrovertible fact, possibly appreciate these stories as mere symbolism?

Blame Jesus.

No really, Jesus is the key.  You see, even if you believe, truly believe that every word of the Bible is meant to be taken literally, not every word of the Bible is meant to be taken literally.  Because Jesus.

Jesus Christ, Jesus of Nazareth, The Messiah, Yeshua Ben Miriam, The Lamb of God, Emmaunuel, Aslan, J-Dawg, Jeezy-Creezy, however you call him, his word carries a lot of weight, resonating like no other in the Western Canon (that term itself is saying quite a bit.)  And he had a lot to say in the Testament in which he appears (the New one, if you were unaware.)

Called ‘Rabbi’ by his followers, he does a lot of talking in the book.  Because that was his gig, really.  He was a teacher, first and foremost.  He did not perform too many really flashy miracles, or master dragons with his magic powers, or even fall from the path of righteousness in his youth, terrorizing others with his power and have to be corrected by his father to remember what he is on Earth for in a fully-developed character arc (actually he does all of these things in the Apocrypha, but you know how editors always leave the best parts on the cutting room floor.)

No, what he does is try to teach the people.  He talks and talks and talks, bringing his message of “knock off that sinning, already!” to the masses.  He leads by example with the whole ‘turning the other cheek’ thing, and extols the crowds with rousing speeches, but when he really wants to make a point, he whips out a parable.

Parables, in this context, are fiction; artificial stories designed to teach a moral lesson by presenting a hypothetical situation designed to make the reader think.  The veracity of the story is in no way pertinent to the message itself, it is how the reader interacts with the events of the story that conveys the crucial information, and that is the whole point of the telling.

So if parables are good enough for Jesus, why couldn’t a contemporary person of faith extend that to the rest of the Bible?  What if we considered the story of Noah’s Ark on the same level as the story of the Good Samaritan?  Rather than quibbling over unnecessary details like who Adam & Eve’s remaining son did his begetting with, or waving placards about gaps in the fossil record, what if everyone was able to enjoy the beauty of the story itself, and treat it as a valuable teaching aid, inspiring spirited discussion and analysis?

And that’s what I’m here to sell you today dear friend: the idea of Bible that is not secularized, but freed from its religious context.  A Bible that is open to everyone, and free to educate and enlighten anyone who is looking for guidance and wisdom.  A Bible that can bring all of its readers closer together in pursuit of understanding.

Thank you for your time and have a nice day.


Also, do you happen to have a Koran lying around?  I haven’t read that one yet, and I hear it has Djinn in it.   That sounds cool.